2017-10-25 16:54 GMT+02:00 Jason Brooks <jbro...@redhat.com>: > Hi all -- > > As part of a documentation project I'm working on with the Fedora > Atomic WG, I started packaging asciibinder[1] with the intention of > getting the package into Fedora. Along the way[2], I encountered a > bunch of required, unpackaged dependencies, which would also have to > be added to Fedora. > > [1] http://asciibinder.org/ > [2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jasonbrooks/ > asciibinder/packages/ > > It has me wondering whether packaging these gems as rpms is > worthwhile, especially since we'd end up running asciibinder in a > container, anyway. > > What are people's thoughts on the value of packaging gems -- it's it > worthwhile, is it somehow UnFedora to not bother to package them? >
Having them packaged as RPM ensures their licenses have been checked and binaries are built from sources. I'm +1 for having them packaged. > > Jason > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> <http://www.teraplan.it/redhat-osd-2017/>
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
