On 12/08/2017 11:28 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 12/08/2017 05:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 10:59:20AM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 12/08/2017 10:12 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >>>> How would the overhead be lower? Instead of a single clean commit that >>>> does what needs to be done you want the person doing this cleanup on a >>>> hundred packages to send you a special message and wait while you make >>>> the decision whether to allow a three line change or not? Please explain. >>> Who determines "needs to be done" Shouldn't the owner of the package be in >>> on the determination, with silents being acceptance after a certain amount >>> of time? I think so. >> >> This is completely infeasible to contact each maintainer individually >> when doing massive changes. The policy specifies that the mass change >> should be pre-announced, discussed, and announced on the mailing list. >> This procedure was followed, the changes are simple and correct. My apologies for not making myself clear... I understand the need to make massive changes... The problem I have is a single change is made because it "feels" right... Those changes need to go by the maintainer.
>> >>> Yes to your second question... For one reason... maintaining stability. >>> You give people the ability to change anything and everything they >>> want w/out any review... that is called instability... >> >> No, those changes don't have any effect on the way that your package >> operates, they just change the reference from an obsolete name to >> one that actually exists. Without such changes we would have more >> and more obsolete cruft in packages. It's great that somebody is willing >> to spend their time keeping the distro tidy. Change, if done carefully, >> does not mean instability. > > I wholeheartedly agree with Zbyszek here. Well said. I too agree WRT massive build and/or changes... but anything else need to go through them maintainer. steved. > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
