On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 5:17 AM Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 20-12-18 10:54, Raphael Groner wrote: > >> So what process should I use? Pull Requests or just removing obsolete > >> stuff? > >> I'm ready to do either way. Should I leave this to FESCo? > > > > My vote would go for Pull Requests to give the packagers a (limited) chance > > to look into the proposal individually. Maybe after some elapsed time have > > waited, you or someone else could just merge with the force of > > provenpackager. > > Ugh no I maintain somewhere between a 100 and 200 packages in Fedora, > just push the changes directly please. 100-200 pull-reqs is going to > be a big pain. > > Even just deleting all the notifications from them, without maybe > also accidentally deleting a non automated pullreq is goind to be > a big pain. > > So I say +100 to just pushing the changes directly, as said > people can always revert them. > > Maybe add a note in the changes page about this and a link > to the changes page in the spec file changelog, something like: > -For more info see: http://.... >
+1000000 Please, just push the changes. We'll all get notified anyway via fedmsg or other means that a change has been pushed. The PR-based method was too obnoxious when it was done for the Python dependency change. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
