On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:03 PM Ty Young <youngty1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Throwing the baby out with the bathwater, really? Wayland doesn't even > work on a large selection of hardware(Nvidia) and has many missing > features deemed to be vital for some people which X. Org does have. This > has been a common criticism of Wayland and every advocates and > developers put their fingers in their ears and ignore it. People are > just going to continue to use X. Org, if this is they way you're going > to do things, you realize?
https://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2019/06/24/on-the-road-to-fedora-workstation-31/ There are improvements happening in both Wayland and XWayland to address each of your concerns. If some projects want to keep using X, that's their choice, but the X developers are the Wayland developers, and they're pretty much completely done with X. It's on life support. So if people who haven't been maintaining X expect others to keep doing that work, they're going to be disappointed. They need to be using what resources they have to make sure their stuff at least works on XWayland if not natively on Wayland. This is not news, by the way. It's been a long time coming. -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
