On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 8:37 AM Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 8:33 AM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > People regularly look at NEVRAs to identify whether there are
> > "broken"/"old" packages to clean up, and when you see .fc29 installed
> > on an otherwise .fc31 system, it looks like something has gone wrong.
> > If packages are intended to be built once and pushed to multiple
> > releases, it shouldn't have the DistTag suffix.
>
> OK, I misunderstood you because DistTag and %{?dist} are actually
> distinct things in RPM and you're using the wrong one here :)
>It's called that in the Packaging Guidelines: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/DistTag/ It should probably be named differently now that there's an _actual_ DistTag. > That's an interesting thought and we should consider what to do about > it. Mind opening a ticket on https://pagure.io/modularity so we don't > forget? Done: https://pagure.io/modularity/issue/157 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
