On 15. 11. 19 2:56, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 11/14/19 7:56 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
**What are the benefits of default modular streams over non-modular packages?**


I think Adam Williamson tried to answer that in a message in the thread "Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path" (link below) when he wrote:

"if you just don't modularize FreeIPA ... we're stuck shipping this one version of FreeIPA for the next seventy jillion years"

That I understood as a RHEL benefit, a solution to a RHEL problem.

We even put Python 2 to a module, so we don't need to support it that long.

Fedora is not supported for jillions of years, but 13 months.
Fedora has a hard rule that (default?) modular EOLs must align with Fedora release EOL.

So I don't see how this benefit applies for Fedora.

Thanks for the pointer anyway!

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to