On 15. 11. 19 2:56, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 11/14/19 7:56 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
**What are the benefits of default modular streams over non-modular packages?**
I think Adam Williamson tried to answer that in a message in the thread "Re:
Modularity and the system-upgrade path" (link below) when he wrote:
"if you just don't modularize FreeIPA ... we're stuck shipping this one version
of FreeIPA for the next seventy jillion years"
That I understood as a RHEL benefit, a solution to a RHEL problem.
We even put Python 2 to a module, so we don't need to support it that long.
Fedora is not supported for jillions of years, but 13 months.
Fedora has a hard rule that (default?) modular EOLs must align with Fedora
release EOL.
So I don't see how this benefit applies for Fedora.
Thanks for the pointer anyway!
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
