On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 20:51 +0000, Johannes Lips wrote: > > "Johannes Lips" <johannes.lips(a)gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > We already have a tool for reporting issues and problems, and it's not > > bodhi. If there's a problem with an already pushed update, it needs to > > be in bugzilla - where it's actually discoverable - not in bodhi, where > > it will go nowhere. > I am not intending to use bodhi as a bug tracker, but I would like to be able > to reference issues, which were introduced with an update and I don't really > see a lot of negative effects of this. > I think it's a way to make issues in bugzilla more easily traceable, since if > an update is closely related with a new bug it is easier to just look into > bodhi first and see if the issue affected others as well. If by chance the > first reporter of a bug is too late in bodhi this connection is simply lost. > I don't see it as bodhi replacing bugzilla, but rather as an additional entry > point, when looking for known issues in close relation with a bug.
FWIW, there is in fact an open Bodhi ticket for this: https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3748 which references the earlier ticket that requested comments be disallowed on stable updates: https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/2050 -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
