On Sat, Dec 7, 2019, 17:30 Mattia Verga via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> Il 06/12/19 21:51, Johannes Lips ha scritto:
> >> "Johannes Lips" <johannes.lips(a)gmail.com&gt; writes:
> >>
> >>
> >> We already have a tool for reporting issues and problems, and it's not
> >> bodhi.  If there's a problem with an already pushed update, it needs to
> >> be in bugzilla - where it's actually discoverable - not in bodhi, where
> >> it will go nowhere.
> > I am not intending to use bodhi as a bug tracker, but I would like to be
> able to reference issues, which were introduced with an update and I don't
> really see a lot of negative effects of this.
> > I think it's a way to make issues in bugzilla more easily traceable,
> since if an update is closely related with a new bug it is easier to just
> look into bodhi first and see if the issue affected others as well. If by
> chance the first reporter of a bug is too late in bodhi this connection is
> simply lost.
> > I don't see it as bodhi replacing bugzilla, but rather as an additional
> entry point, when looking for known issues in close relation with a bug.
> >
> > Johannes
> >
> As a user, if I find a bug in a package I would look into Bugzilla. As a
> packager, I would expect to receive bug against my packages in Bugzilla.
>
> In my opinion, allowing comments on already pushed updates would mean
> that some users think that reporting bugs into Bodhi equals to reporting
> bugs into Bugzilla... so as a user I would have to look into Bodhi AND
> Bugzilla when I find regressions and as a packager I would have to deal
> with BZ tickets AND Bodhi comments without BZ tickets.
>
> If you **really** want to re-open comments on stable updates, please add
> a very big, red warning which states that the package maintainer may not
> look at new comments and to open a new BZ ticket!
>
> Mattia
>

I'm curious about this. I do get email notifications for all changes and
comments for all my own bodhi updates plus for every update that I
commented on. Have you turned this off, or do you mean to say you're going
to ignore bodhi emails?

It would be enough to let users comment on an update for, let's say, a week
after it's pushed to stable. That way, immediate feedback isn't lost, but
bugs that are found after that time period need to go to bugzilla.

Fabio


> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to