On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:

> On 10/19/2010 11:25 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 16:22 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hmm, So when this was broken a lot of bugs were triggered?
> >>>
> >>> Sure seems like if a lot of bugs are being triggered then it is NOT a
> >>> niche usecase.
> >>>
> >>> You can't have it both ways.
> >>
> >> Very few people do it. When they do, lots of things break. It's kind of
> >> like trying to run Fedora under the NetBSD Linux emulation. Nobody does
> >> it, but if they did they'd find that a surprising quantity of code
> >> wouldn't work.
> >
> > you keep asserting this claim - and yet all the evidence in terms of
> > concerned users comes to the contrary.
> >
> > Can you document or backup your assertion?
>
> This seems like a question smolt should be able to answer...
>

This is what is currently in the wild for /usr:

mysql> select mnt_pnt,count(*) as cnt from file_systems where mnt_pnt like
'/usr%' group by mnt_pnt order by cnt;
+-------------------+-------+
| mnt_pnt           | cnt   |
+-------------------+-------+
| /usr/share/dict   |     1 |
| /usr/src/debug    |     1 |
| /usr/tmp          |     1 |
| /usr/share/icons  |     1 |
| /usr/local/sbin   |     1 |
| /usr/sbin         |     2 |
| /usr/include      |     2 |
| /usr/src/packages |     3 |
| /usr/local/bin    |     5 |
| /usr/X11R6        |     6 |
| /usr/local/share  |     9 |
| /usr/bin          |    11 |
| /usr/share/doc    |    14 |
| /usr/games        |    16 |
| /usr/lib64        |    30 |
| /usr/local/src    |    33 |
| /usr/lib          |    41 |
| /usr/local/games  |    43 |
| /usr/share        |   163 |
| /usr/src          |   329 |
| /usr/local        | 12814 |
| /usr              | 37171 |
+-------------------+-------+
22 rows in set (3.25 sec)

This is out of 1,702,459 submissions of profiles that included filesystem
data.  So about 3% of users have something mounted in /usr and about 2.2%
have /usr mounted directly.

        -Mike
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to