I get errors mentioning gnuradio and codec2, probably as a result of the
version change in codec2; i.e., codec2-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 versus
codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64.
Full report below.
Steve
# dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35
--enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync
Fedora 35 - x86_64 9.8 MB/s | 78 MB
00:07
Fedora 35 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 5.1 kB/s | 2.5 kB
00:00
Fedora Modular 35 - x86_64 2.8 MB/s | 3.3 MB
00:01
Fedora 35 - x86_64 - Updates 490 B/s | 257 B
00:00
Fedora Modular 35 - x86_64 - Updates 427 B/s | 257 B
00:00
Fedora 35 - x86_64 - Test Updates 4.9 MB/s | 6.5 MB
00:01
Fedora Modular 35 - x86_64 - Test Updates 656 kB/s | 1.3 MB
00:02
RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Free 1.2 MB/s | 946 kB
00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Free - Updates 4.1 kB/s | 1.8 kB
00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Nonfree 508 kB/s | 243 kB
00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Nonfree - Updates 2.1 kB/s | 1.2 kB
00:00
Fedora 35 - x86_64 - Updates Archive 194 B/s | 531 B
00:02
Error:
Problem 1: problem with installed package gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64
- package gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.0.9()(64bit),
but none of the providers can be installed
- gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
Problem 2: package gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libcodec2.so.0.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both codec2-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 and
codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-analog.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-audio.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-blocks.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-channels.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-digital.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-fec.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-fft.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-filter.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-network.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-pmt.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-qtgui.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-runtime.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-soapy.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-trellis.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-uhd.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-video-sdl.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-vocoder.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-wavelet.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires
libgnuradio-zeromq.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires gnuradio(x86-64) =
3.9.2.0-5.fc35, but none of the providers can be installed
- package codec2-devel-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 requires
libcodec2.so.1.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package codec2-devel-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 requires codec2(x86-64) =
1.0.0-1.fc35.2, but none of the providers can be installed
- problem with installed package gnuradio-devel-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64
- problem with installed package codec2-devel-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64
- gnuradio-devel-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- codec2-devel-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
Problem 3: cannot install both codec2-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 and
codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64
- package gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.0.9()(64bit),
but none of the providers can be installed
- package lpcnetfreedv-0.2-9.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.1.0()(64bit),
but none of the providers can be installed
- package gnuradio-doc-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires gnuradio =
3.9.2.0-5.fc35, but none of the providers can be installed
- problem with installed package lpcnetfreedv-0.2-7.fc34.x86_64
- problem with installed package gnuradio-doc-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64
- lpcnetfreedv-0.2-7.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- gnuradio-doc-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- nothing provides libcodec2.so.0.9 needed by gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.i686
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or
'--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
saf#
On 9/7/21 12:14 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \
distro-sync
This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal
potential problems.
You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command.
If you get this prompt:
...
Total download size: XXX M
Is this ok [y/N]:
you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade.
But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please
report it against the appropriate package.
Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora
35. Please check existing reports against
fedora-obsolete-packages first:
https://red.ht/2kuBDPu
and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F35FailsToInstall)
reports:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1927313&bug_id_type=anddependson&format=tvp&list_id=12125305#
Thank you
Miroslav
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
