On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 11:25 AM Ankur Sinha <sanjay.an...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Tested on two machines, went without a hitch on one, but I got this on > the other: > > Error: > Problem 1: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25-1.fc34.x86_64 > - 0ad-0.0.25-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - nothing provides 0ad-data = 0.0.24b needed by 0ad-0.0.24b-3.fc35.x86_64 > Problem 2: package eclipse-jdt-1:4.19-3.fc34.noarch requires > osgi(org.hamcrest.core), but none of the providers can be installed > - hamcrest-core-1.3-31.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package eclipse-jdt-1:4.19-3.fc34.noarch > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) > > For 0ad, I see that 0.0.25b-1 was pushed to testing in F33 and F34 but > not in F35 yet. Not sure if it's a FTBFS there at the moment. > > eclipse has been retired IIRC, so I guess that's the issue here.
Yeah, the "main" eclipse package has been retired, but other packages in the stack had not been. As discussed in the "Orphaned packages need new maintainers" thread, I have now gone ahead and retired the remaining eclipse packages: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/J4TYLSIWUGPAIIOHIDQFVNZMELIS7H7J/ And also filed a bug against fedora-obsolete-packages to have those packages removed on upgrade to Fedora 35. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
