> Am 02.06.2022 um 22:42 schrieb Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com>:
> 
> 
> It's not standard at all. We don't even test for this setup regularly.
> It's not a test case, and it's not even supposed to work right now.

It’s standard as it is a typical use case in private or SME environments. 

And do you really think we distribute dmraid for years now "and it's not even 
supposed to work right now.“?

And don't hide behind formalistic arguments that just suit you by chance. Your 
change proposal deliberately makes it impossible for existing server users (or 
makes it unnecessarily overly difficult) who have relied (and could rely) on us 
so far to continue using Fedora Server. I consider this irresponsible. And I 
don't understand why you stubbornly insist on this change proposal as is, 
instead of looking for solutions that keep mischief away from our users and 
change to GPT as default (which is undoubtedly the future standard).  


> Also, any system with drives >=2TB will get GPT automatically, you
> can't have MBR in those setups. All this does is remove the default
> special case for smaller disks.

This is a completely different case. For disks > 2 TB simply nothing changes, 
neither better nor worse. For disks < 2 TB your change proposal results in a 
deterioration. Why do you want it so badly?  


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to