On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 12:46 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 09:36:35AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > I'm guessing Josh's response was an attempt to use AI to generate a > > summary. In the future, please label it as such, so people will read > > it with a critical eye. It has some flaws which I will address inline: > > If content is labelled as written by AI I'd skip reading it entirely. > Reading "with a critical eye" implies we have to either guess (or > research) which parts are accurate and which are wrong, neither option > being desirable. > > I'd ask for human written summaries, or none at all, in prefence to > misleading AI summaries.
Human in the loop is of course important. The intention would be to have FESCo review any AI generated content for accuracy before sending it out. From a consumer perspective, you get content that has been validated by a human and you should be able to trust it like you would any other email sent. If FESCo doesn't want to use AI at all, I don't care. I just want better summaries than what zodbot is currently providing (which aren't reviewed either afaics...) josh -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
