On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Thomas Spura <toms...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:46:34 -0500 > Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: >> rversion=2.1 >> subversion=400 >> >> >> Spec file extract: >> Version: %{rversion}.%{subversion} >> Release: 2%{?locmark} >> Source: ...../%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz >> >> So the potential for disasters is real? > > It would help to know which package this is about. :)
It looks like the "clement" package, whose maintainer should reread the packaging guidelines for packages with svn revisions as part of their e-v-r combinations. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel