On 30 October 2012 18:45, Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> wrote: > so if were to try and switch back to oldui at > this point, we'd have to go through the whole process of adjusting the > code for the changes to dracut again, quite apart from any other issues.
I don't understand how fixing up the old anaconda with the dracut changes would be so difficult. More than 140 man-hours? It's surely going to be a lot less work than getting anaconda to a point where it actually works with a consistent UI. Anaconda isn't the kind of thing we can fix with a zero day update, and surely it should have been developed in parallel with a release and then "switched on" just after branching rather than the situation we have now where there is major design and development work being done *so close* to where we should have everything locked down tight. I really don't see why the Anaconda team should be treated so differently from every other team. If we ship anything close to the Anaconda we've got now then F18 is going to get ripped apart by the reviewers. Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
