On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:58 PM, David Airlie <airl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Richard Hughes" <hughsi...@gmail.com> > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, 31 October, 2012 6:35:14 AM > > Subject: Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: > how to install into a LVM partitions (or > > RAID)) > > > > On 30 October 2012 18:45, Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > so if were to try and switch back to oldui at > > > this point, we'd have to go through the whole process of adjusting > > > the > > > code for the changes to dracut again, quite apart from any other > > > issues. > > > > I don't understand how fixing up the old anaconda with the dracut > > changes would be so difficult. More than 140 man-hours? It's surely > > going to be a lot less work than getting anaconda to a point where it > > actually works with a consistent UI. Anaconda isn't the kind of thing > > we can fix with a zero day update, and surely it should have been > > developed in parallel with a release and then "switched on" just > > after > > branching rather than the situation we have now where there is major > > design and development work being done *so close* to where we should > > have everything locked down tight. > > > > I really don't see why the Anaconda team should be treated so > > differently from every other team. If we ship anything close to the > > Anaconda we've got now then F18 is going to get ripped apart by the > > reviewers. > > Should we just skip F18? (like seriously). > > Dave. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Or just push the release by 1-2 months, So there is time to beat anaconda into shape, going back to oldui will not be very productive, then we will have the same problems in F19 Tim
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel