----- Original Message ----- > From: "Richard Hughes" <hughsi...@gmail.com> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Sent: Wednesday, 31 October, 2012 6:35:14 AM > Subject: Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how > to install into a LVM partitions (or > RAID)) > > On 30 October 2012 18:45, Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > so if were to try and switch back to oldui at > > this point, we'd have to go through the whole process of adjusting > > the > > code for the changes to dracut again, quite apart from any other > > issues. > > I don't understand how fixing up the old anaconda with the dracut > changes would be so difficult. More than 140 man-hours? It's surely > going to be a lot less work than getting anaconda to a point where it > actually works with a consistent UI. Anaconda isn't the kind of thing > we can fix with a zero day update, and surely it should have been > developed in parallel with a release and then "switched on" just > after > branching rather than the situation we have now where there is major > design and development work being done *so close* to where we should > have everything locked down tight. > > I really don't see why the Anaconda team should be treated so > differently from every other team. If we ship anything close to the > Anaconda we've got now then F18 is going to get ripped apart by the > reviewers.
Should we just skip F18? (like seriously). Dave. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
