On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 03:12:56PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > >>As soon as an feature depends on other components or several other > >>components and their maintainers involvement/participation, then for > >>example the unresponsive maintainers policy conflicts with the > >>feature process given our relatively short development cycle. ( in > >Can you explain that a little more? Do you mean the policy is too slow? > Dead/un-maintained packages need to be removed/reassigned at the > very *beginning* of an new development cycle so feature owners and > others working in the community are dealing with active and actively > maintained packages.
Okay. But I'm having trouble seeing how that's a blocker for incremental improvement to the features process. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mat...@fedoraproject.org> -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
