Am 10.01.2014 16:49, schrieb Dridi Boukelmoune: > I actually remember a comparison matrix of OpenSolaris forks, some of > them chose /rpm5?/ for package management, but I can't find a link. > > I do understand why people would want such features built-in, but it > seems a bit short-sighted. And by short-sighted I don't mean a bad > idea, I mean restricted to Fedora/RHEL and very close distributions. I > don't know yum's goals, but the man page yum(8) and the faq don''t > seem to mention any tight coupling to rhel-like linux distribution. > Again, I'm not saying this would be a bad thing. AFAICT yum is tied > *by essence* to rhel, but I'm also wondering what upstream thinks > about portability, because the whole kernel issue is a portability no-no
in that case the approach to have it as plugin is absolutely fine * but this plugin should be available at the same time YUM is replaced by DNF * it should be in the default install I only have a problem with "*could* be implemented" while try to replace something which *has* it implemented, this would be a step backwards from the users point of view insteda a improvement not more, not less
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
