----- Original Message -----
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.bad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 04:41:29PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> >>
> >> An alternative would be to reassign every open merge review to the
> >> component
> >> in question, and let maintainers handle it as they like.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> > Alternative idea -- maybe identify all packages which are not ciritcal and
> > have an open merge review.  Take those packages out of the repository.
> 
> That's a bit harsh ... we have been shipping those packages for years, why
> suddenly drop them? What problem does this solve?

Yep, it's really too strict. Also setting the bar how much package is 
critical sounds weird. 

For reviews - I'd say most of the review requests bugs are already
obsolete. 

What would actually help making Fedora better would be regular fedora-
review (*) runs - even I'm again a bit sceptical we would be able to go
through it same as for merge reviews. But for more active maintainers
it could help them to make SPECs better.

(*) not full review, much more easier tool to check basic sanity of
SPECs...

Jaroslav

> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to