Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Eh. We're constrained by our own policies here, not by anything
> fundamental - LLVM being broken on ARM ought to mean that our ARM
> product is worse, not that everything else is dragged down to the same
> level.
Didn't YOU vote for ARM as a primary architecture, and even actively lobby
for it? Now you get to pick the (poisoned) fruit…
This nonsense is exactly what "primary architecture" means.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
