On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:49:34PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 15.09.2014 um 14:44 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:40:34PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> > >> Am 15.09.2014 um 14:28 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > >>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:57:13AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >>>> 1) I run some application, which loads my foo.rb file. > >>>> 2) I later update the package which removes bar.rb file. > >>>> 3) And I call some_function which fails due to missing bar.rb > >>> > >>> How is this not 'foo' simply being broken? ie. Not expressing its > >>> needs properly in its RPM dependencies? > >>> > >>> It would still have been broken even with a reboot > >> > >> no - why should it? > >> > >> 'foo' is loaded in memory, updated and now has different dependencies > >> no longer require 'bar.rb' but your running version still do > > > > Please read closely. 'foo' has *not* been updated. > > > > If 'foo' had been updated, we would have spotted it and restarted that > > process using my technique outlined in the previous email > > cross deps coming in my mind > foo -> library -> library -> library > > * the first maybe already loaded > * also loaded the second one in a previous call > * that version relies on teh third one for some operations > * in a update the deps have changed > > so you may have a mix with different dep-chains in memory > and some parts used the first time from disk with unexpected > results
I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests. http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
