On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Jerry Vonau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, the upgrade is not painful. The weird thing I found is about yum, > $releasever, and fedora-updates.repo, we have two issues.. > > First with the use of xs-release when I do a "rpm -q --whatprovides > /etc/fedora-release" I get back: > fedora-release-7-3.noarch > xs-release-9-0.4.12.noarch > which will confuse the heck out of yum if you have $releasever anywhere. > > I guess we should have xs-release do: > Obsoletes: fedora-release
Ah, that only happens on an update, correct? > Second, I found the above because I did a "yum repolist" and the > fedora-update repo from the F7 install was active. Need to remove that one, > maybe from xs-release? Well, it's gone from xs-release -- why does it show up as active? Maybe we have to recommend a manual step, but what would that be? cheers, m -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ Server-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel