On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Jerry Vonau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Well, it's gone from xs-release -- why does it show up as active? >> Maybe we have to recommend a manual step, but what would that be? >> > It's from fedora-release, and was used for the normal updates repo, until > the "key issue" came into being. xs-release will need to follow what ever > fedora-release does, my guess is to rename/disable that repo file. I'm > pretty sure fedora-release will change back to the prior layout post F9. > Might want to check the layout of a F10 fedora-release.
I've read that thrice now, and I have to confess, I can't quite follow what you are trying to say :-/ xs-release was built copying on the post-new-key fedora package, from the F9 'branch' in CVS. Instead of using $release in the yum files, I've hardcoded the 'f9' there because we fiddle with $release. In xs-0.4 we had yum reading a different yum repos directory, with repos there that were a bit messy. With xs-0.5 we return to using the files in yum.repos.d - as vanilla fedora does. When we port to F10 or F11 we'll update the files, of course, but that comes later. Another thing to note is that the 'olpcxs-testing' repo we'll continue to use towards 0.6, whereas the 'olpcxs' repo is clearly xs-0.5. Does that make sense to you? Can you see a significant problem in the setup? cheers, m -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ Server-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
