...and cmr to v1.5.  ;-)

(see https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/2133)



On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:33 PM, George Bosilca wrote:

> Rainer,
> 
> The patch looks correct. Please feel free to push it in the trunk.
> 
>  Thanks,
>    george.
> 
> On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:27 , Rainer Keller wrote:
> 
>> Hello Sylvain,
>> 
>> On Friday 04 December 2009 02:27:22 pm Sylvain Jeaugey wrote:
>>> There is definetly something wrong in types.
>> Yes, the new ids for optional Fortran datatypes are wrong.
>> 
>> So, as with other Fortran types, IMHO they need to map to C types, aka the 
>> IDs 
>> should map. Therefore, we should _not_ increase the number of predefined 
>> types 
>> -- these are fixed as representable by C...
>> 
>> The below patch does just that and fixes Your testcase!
>> 
>> George, what do You think? Could You check, please?
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Rainer
>> 
>> PS: Yes, You're perfectly right, that the number of Fortran tests (esp. with 
>> regard to optional ddt) are too low.
>> Several features of MPI (MPI-2 are not well represented in MTT).
>> -- 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Rainer Keller, PhD                  Tel: +1 (865) 241-6293
>> Oak Ridge National Lab          Fax: +1 (865) 241-4811
>> PO Box 2008 MS 6164           Email: kel...@ornl.gov
>> Oak Ridge, TN 37831-2008    AIM/Skype: rusraink
>> 
>> <ompi_datatype_optional_fortran-2009.12.07.diff>_______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com


Reply via email to