On Jun 22, 2012, at 11:26 PM, TERRY DONTJE wrote: >> 4. The behavior of --with[out]-verbs is as was described in a prior mail: >> - if --with-verbs is specified, all 3 verbs-based components must succeed >> - if --without-verbs is specified, all 4 verbs-based components will not >> build >> - if --with-verbs=DIR is specified, all 3 verbs-based components must >> succeed and will use DIR to find verbs headers and libraries >> > What does it mean that "all 3 verbs-based components must succeed"? > Does that mean you cannot specify --with-verbs=DIR --with-openib > --without-ofud?
Yes. --with/without-ofud never worked, anyway (i.e., there was no code that implemented it). Ditto that there was no --with/without-ud. > Does it mean that if you specify --with-verbs=DIR and some other dependency > is not found for openib btl that the configure fails? Yes. Same was true for --with-openib=DIR. > What is the 4th verbs-based component this is not built when one specifies > --without-verbs. There isn't one. You're probably thinking of hwloc; hwloc can *use* verbs, but it doesn't *require* verbs. The other 3 (OOB UD, BTL OFUD, BTL openib) all *require* verbs and cannot be built without it. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
