I am on the same page with George here - if it's on the list then support it until its been removed.
I happen to have systems to test, I believe, every supported atomics implementation except for DEC Alpha, and so I did test them all. AFAIK ARMv5 is even out-dated as a smartphone platform. -Paul On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:46 AM, George Bosilca <bosi...@icl.utk.edu> wrote: > It is not that I care, but it was one of our supported platforms and we > don't usually drop support for anything without a proper RFC. > > George. > > > > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Dave Goodell (dgoodell) < > dgood...@cisco.com> wrote: > >> On Aug 7, 2014, at 11:37 PM, George Bosilca <bosi...@icl.utk.edu> wrote: >> >> > Paul's tests identified an small issue with the previous patch (a real >> corner-case for ARM v5). The patch below is fixing all known issues. >> >> Wait, why do we care about ARMv5? It's certainly not a serious HPC >> platform, nor is it even a relevant laptop platform at this point (AFAIK). >> >> -Dave >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> de...@open-mpi.org >> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >> Link to this post: >> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/08/15614.php >> > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/08/15615.php > -- Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Future Technologies Group Computer and Data Sciences Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900
