On Feb 25, 2015, at 1:17 PM, Paul Hargrove <phhargr...@lbl.gov> wrote:
> 
> Assuming that the new tarball finds dlopen() support in libc on the BSDs then 
> I am not going to encounter the new behavior unless I manually disable 
> (something like "--enable-mca-no-build=dl-dlopen", right?).  To be honest, 
> any platform that does reach this point is going to be rare (in the absence 
> of the bugs that Dave refers to).  So, this "departure" seems to be pretty 
> minor (IMHO).
> 
> It really comes down to:
> "Sorry, but we can't fix the situation without your help - you must chose to 
> either (1) install libltdl for dynamically linked components or (2) 
> --disable-dlopen for statically linked components". 

Well, that's a good point (that platforms that don't support dlopen() these 
days are kinda rare).  Hence, this solution could be "good enough".

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Reply via email to