Sorry, I meant:

bot:hargrove


> On Feb 25, 2015, at 3:01 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Per my prior mail, m4 typo fixed -- could you release the hounds again?
> 
>> On Feb 25, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Paul Hargrove <phhargr...@lbl.gov> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Paul Hargrove <phhargr...@lbl.gov> wrote:
>> I did that and just shipped a tarball to get Hargroved.
>> 
>> Tests have been dispatched...  I will report complete results later today.
>> The first of the BSD results should be in soon, and I'll plan to report 
>> go/nogo.
>> 
>> "NOGO"
>> 
>> I don't have full results (and no backtraces, yet), however things actually 
>> look *worse* than the previous tarball.
>> While the previous tarball gave a pretty message, the current one SEGVs on 
>> {Free,Net}BSD.
>> 
>> 
>> On FreeBSD-{8,9,10}/amd64 I don't get past "make check":
>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>> FAIL: dlopen_test
>> Oddly, my FreeBSD-10/i386 tester passed my tests (I don't test FreeBSD-{8,9} 
>> on i386).
>> 
>> On NetBSD-6/amd64 I also fail "make check", but w/o the "Segmentation fault" 
>> message (difference might not be OMPI-related):
>> FAIL: dlopen_test
>> 
>> On NetBSD-6/i386 I don't see the problem during "make check" but get a terse 
>> failure from mpirun:
>> $ mpirun -mca btl sm,self -np 2 examples/ring_c'
>> [netbsd6-i386:05263] *** Process received signal ***
>> [netbsd6-i386:05263] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
>> [netbsd6-i386:05263] Signal code: Address not mapped (1)
>> [netbsd6-i386:05263] Failing at address: 0xbb800000
>> Unable to print stack trace!
>> [netbsd6-i386:05263] *** End of error message ***
>> 
>> 
>> On OpenBSD-5 everything appears to "just work" now on both amd64 and i386.
>> 
>> When I have a chance (might not be until Thu) I will collect backtraces from 
>> the SEGVs on FreeBSD and NetBSD, as well as sanity checking the related 
>> configure output.
>> 
>> 
>> Jeff,
>> 
>> In the meantime you may want to visit
>>   
>> https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=dlopen&sektion=3&manpath=FreeBSD+10.1-RELEASE
>>   
>> https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=dlopen&sektion=3&manpath=NetBSD+6.1.5
>> and see if the OMPI usage of dlopen() is consistent with the docs for 
>> FreeBSD and NetBSD.
>> 
>> -Paul
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Paul H. Hargrove                          phhargr...@lbl.gov
>> Computer Languages & Systems Software (CLaSS) Group
>> Computer Science Department               Tel: +1-510-495-2352
>> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory     Fax: +1-510-486-6900
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> Link to this post: 
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/02/17040.php
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquy...@cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to: 
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> 


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Reply via email to