I've queued new tests for the platforms w/ verbs-related failures.
Is there any point retesting the BSDs as well?

-Paul

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <
jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:

> Sorry, I meant:
>
> bot:hargrove
>
>
> > On Feb 25, 2015, at 3:01 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Per my prior mail, m4 typo fixed -- could you release the hounds again?
> >
> >> On Feb 25, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Paul Hargrove <phhargr...@lbl.gov> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Paul Hargrove <phhargr...@lbl.gov>
> wrote:
> >> I did that and just shipped a tarball to get Hargroved.
> >>
> >> Tests have been dispatched...  I will report complete results later
> today.
> >> The first of the BSD results should be in soon, and I'll plan to report
> go/nogo.
> >>
> >> "NOGO"
> >>
> >> I don't have full results (and no backtraces, yet), however things
> actually look *worse* than the previous tarball.
> >> While the previous tarball gave a pretty message, the current one SEGVs
> on {Free,Net}BSD.
> >>
> >>
> >> On FreeBSD-{8,9,10}/amd64 I don't get past "make check":
> >> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> >> FAIL: dlopen_test
> >> Oddly, my FreeBSD-10/i386 tester passed my tests (I don't test
> FreeBSD-{8,9} on i386).
> >>
> >> On NetBSD-6/amd64 I also fail "make check", but w/o the "Segmentation
> fault" message (difference might not be OMPI-related):
> >> FAIL: dlopen_test
> >>
> >> On NetBSD-6/i386 I don't see the problem during "make check" but get a
> terse failure from mpirun:
> >> $ mpirun -mca btl sm,self -np 2 examples/ring_c'
> >> [netbsd6-i386:05263] *** Process received signal ***
> >> [netbsd6-i386:05263] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
> >> [netbsd6-i386:05263] Signal code: Address not mapped (1)
> >> [netbsd6-i386:05263] Failing at address: 0xbb800000
> >> Unable to print stack trace!
> >> [netbsd6-i386:05263] *** End of error message ***
> >>
> >>
> >> On OpenBSD-5 everything appears to "just work" now on both amd64 and
> i386.
> >>
> >> When I have a chance (might not be until Thu) I will collect backtraces
> from the SEGVs on FreeBSD and NetBSD, as well as sanity checking the
> related configure output.
> >>
> >>
> >> Jeff,
> >>
> >> In the meantime you may want to visit
> >>
> https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=dlopen&sektion=3&manpath=FreeBSD+10.1-RELEASE
> >>
> https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=dlopen&sektion=3&manpath=NetBSD+6.1.5
> >> and see if the OMPI usage of dlopen() is consistent with the docs for
> FreeBSD and NetBSD.
> >>
> >> -Paul
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Paul H. Hargrove                          phhargr...@lbl.gov
> >> Computer Languages & Systems Software (CLaSS) Group
> >> Computer Science Department               Tel: +1-510-495-2352
> >> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory     Fax: +1-510-486-6900
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> devel mailing list
> >> de...@open-mpi.org
> >> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> >> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/02/17040.php
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jeff Squyres
> > jsquy...@cisco.com
> > For corporate legal information go to:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> >
>
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquy...@cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/02/17044.php
>



-- 
Paul H. Hargrove                          phhargr...@lbl.gov
Computer Languages & Systems Software (CLaSS) Group
Computer Science Department               Tel: +1-510-495-2352
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory     Fax: +1-510-486-6900

Reply via email to