On 21 Jun 2014, at 19:54, Tone Kastlunger <users.giulie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > great job! > It would be amazing to get a (link to a ) list of features coming with this > release of qt to jolla. A more complete list will be compiled when we're about to release. For the Qt bits, at least everything from qtbase and qtdeclarative in: http://qt-project.org/wiki/New-Features-in-Qt-5.2 and more in-depth changes files: https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtbase/source/4cb03924c113c74b99e18c7347278600a011e917:dist/changes-5.2.0 https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtbase/source/4cb03924c113c74b99e18c7347278600a011e917:dist/changes-5.2.1 https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtdeclarative/source/d757806537a1e7233bd656e4d2170cfa994d9d44:dist/changes-5.2.0 http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtdeclarative/source/d757806537a1e7233bd656e4d2170cfa994d9d44:dist/changes-5.2.1 cheers, Gunnar > > Best, > tortoisedoc > > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Gunnar Sletta <gunnar.sle...@jolla.com> > wrote: > > On 21 Jun 2014, at 16:21, Alejandro Exojo <s...@badopi.org> wrote: > > > El Wednesday 18 June 2014, Robin Burchell escribió: > >> Sorry folks. This wasn’t intended to be posted here, but, have a slight > >> visual on what’s going on behind the curtain anyway. :) > > > > I hope everything went well and nobody phoned you in the middle of sleep. :) > > > >> tl;dr: Qt 5.2 upgrade is on the way in the nearish (but not immediate) > >> future > > > > How come that you are not skipping 5.2 and going straight to 5.3? > > Hi Alejandro, > > Moving to a new Qt release takes quite a bit of effort and our 5.2 branch is > getting into a pretty good shape. Jumping to 5.3 would mean a lot of > additional sanity testing and based on the outcome of that, adapting to > changes and bug fixing. It would delay the update by an unknown amount of > weeks or months. The 5.2 branch already contains stuff which we really want > in the platform (like the improvements to QtQuick) and we want those sooner > rather than later. We'll get around to 5.3 and also 5.4 eventually, though. > Just not right now :) > > > IIRC, you > > had some patches on top of 5.1, so I understand that rebasing them is a lot > > of > > work. Skipping a release might be harder now, but maybe is worth it later > > on. > > Very true, an we've taken steps to get away from that situation. For our Qt > 5.2 branch, we still have a lot of patches, but all of these patches were > upstreamed to 5.3 and 5.4 before they were back-ported into our 5.2 branch, > so we're converging rather than diverging. > > > I'm pretty sure you know what you are doing, but I fear you might end up > > with > > non-upstreamed things and end up with the problem the SDK has, that is some > > releases behind what Qt Creator is upstream, for example. > > It is a valid point, and do we want to stay fairly close to the latest > released Qt, preferably without patches. But since we also have a platform on > top of Qt, there is some latency in getting there. > > Hope that answers your question. > > cheers, > Gunnar > > > > > Cheers. > > > > -- > > Alex (a.k.a. suy) | GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2 > > http://barnacity.net/ | http://disperso.net > > _______________________________________________ > > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > > To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org > > _______________________________________________ > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org > > _______________________________________________ > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org _______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
