On Monday 13 March 2006 17:05, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > > The new version would not require to build tls packages if you do > > not need them. What do you think? Any better idea? > > i don't see a point in having two sets of packages (with and w/o tls). > tls should be included in the only set.
I second this. I see no reason why tls support is not compiled by default into the openser package (and why we keep this dual package thing). TLS can be enabled/disabled at runtime so it only means an extra installation dependency, but that's hardly an issue. -- Dan _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
