Dan Pascu wrote:
On Monday 13 March 2006 17:05, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> The new version would not require to build tls packages if you do
> not need them. What do you think? Any better idea?
i don't see a point in having two sets of packages (with and w/o tls).
tls should be included in the only set.
I second this. I see no reason why tls support is not compiled by default
into the openser package (and why we keep this dual package thing).
TLS can be enabled/disabled at runtime so it only means an extra
installation dependency, but that's hardly an issue.
I agree! Maybe on embedded devices it is relevant to have a non SSL
version, but probably they do not use debian packages.
regards
klaus
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
