On 03/13/06 18:33, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Dan Pascu wrote:
On Monday 13 March 2006 17:05, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> The new version would not require to build tls packages if you do
> not need them. What do you think? Any better idea?
i don't see a point in having two sets of packages (with and w/o tls).
tls should be included in the only set.
I second this. I see no reason why tls support is not compiled by
default into the openser package (and why we keep this dual package
thing).
TLS can be enabled/disabled at runtime so it only means an extra
installation dependency, but that's hardly an issue.
I agree! Maybe on embedded devices it is relevant to have a non SSL
version, but probably they do not use debian packages.
OK, so the patch from Mikael Magnusson with tls enabled by default
should do it. In the case someone (by some circumstances) still wants to
build non-tls package can do it.
Cheers,
Daniel
regards
klaus
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
