On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 06:46:07PM +0300, Igor Sukhih wrote:
> >Guys if we agree on this, I'll send updated variant for libvzctl.
>
> it not needed to update libvzctl.
> it should be custom vz specific patch to criu to handle time specific
> cgroups natively
I already explained, criu should not be patched for some "custom" solution
sake (and VE cgroups are not general cgroups present on any vanilla kernel).
We don't have yet "custom cgroups engine" merged and for a while (until I
update cgorups engine which seems to be after version criu 2) I think
libvzctl is a good candidate, simply because its primary target
_exactly_ pcs7 kernels. Igor, what's drawback of using such approach?
Cyrill
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
