On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 01:02:09PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:32:12AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > > +static int ve_ts_read(struct cgroup *cg, struct cftype *cft, struct > > seq_file *m) > > +{ > > + struct ve_struct *ve = cgroup_ve(cg); > > + struct timespec ts, *delta; > > + > > + do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime(&ts); > > + if (cft->private == VE_CF_START_TIMESPEC) { > > + delta = &ve->start_timespec; > > + } else if (cft->private == VE_CF_REAL_START_TIMESPEC) { > > + delta = &ve->real_start_timespec; > > + monotonic_to_bootbased(&ts); > > + } else { > > + delta = &ts; > > + memset(&ts, 0, sizeof(ts)); > > + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); > > + } > > + > > + set_normalized_timespec(&ts, ts.tv_sec - delta->tv_sec, > > + ts.tv_nsec - delta->tv_nsec); > > + seq_printf(m, "%ld %ld", ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec); > > + return 0; > > +} > > So the output of ve.start_timespec is going to evolve over time, right? > This looks weird to me. Wouldn't it be better if we returned the > timespec as is? >
The idea is that we can read the content of these files and write them back on the another host to restore "a time namespace". _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel