Hi, On 05/08/15 14:38, Oleg Hahm wrote: > I don't see the problem. In implementation A (the nameless stack) udp_send() > calls netapi_send(UDP_THREAD_PID, pointers_to(ip_header+udp_header+payload)) > and in implementation B (nanonet) udp_send() calls netapi_send(active_pid, > pointer_to(payload)). Exactly. In this case "udp_send" is part of the API I'd like to define.
Any application should just use udp_send, and this udp_send shouldn't have a pktsnip as parameter. Kaspar _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
