Hi Kees,

Am 15.06.2016 um 22:07 schrieb Kees Bakker:
On 15-06-16 09:32, Peter Kietzmann wrote:
Hi Kees,

if you volunteer you could start with moving code to samd21_common and
open PR(s) for that :-).

Well, OK. I'll give it a try.

Seems like a step in the right direction. I personally won't find time
for that unfortunately. On our side we could test your PR(s) with the
samr21-xpro board and AFAIK Kaspar has a saml21-xpro board.

Do you have a "build farm" of some sorts? Or do you run tests manually?

We have static build tests (tool named "Murdock") which can be enabled by maintainers in a PR. The rest is done manually with review and local testing.



Regarding the UART issue, could you give some more insights about the
pad you want to add to uart_conf_t? I just gave it a quick look into
the reference manual

http://www.atmel.com/images/atmel-42181-sam-d21_datasheet.pdf

but on the first sight I didn't see a difference to

http://www.atmel.com/Images/Atmel-42223%E2%80%93SAM-R21_Datasheet.pdf

My UART changes have nothing to do with samd21 versus samr21. It's about
selecting a
pin for RX, TX.
For example, on Autonomo use pin PA10 for TX. PA10 is PAD2 of SERCOM0,
with MUX C.
The samr21_xpro has PA4 as TX, PA4 is PAD0 of SERCOM0 (ALT) with MUX D.

Ok I got it. Agree that it makes sense to expand the configuration type.


But as I'm probably biased, do others feel that the folder scheme should
more reflect a vendor's scheme?

I'd like to have the most generic abstraction (e.g. samd21, saml21 and probably samr21) and better no separate folders for each CPU variant. However, I can't estimate the feasibility of that in order to allow support for all these variants. Let's move this discussion to your PR.

Best
Peter


--
Peter Kietzmann

Hamburg University of Applied Sciences
Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group
Berliner Tor 7, 20099 Hamburg, Germany
Fon: +49-40-42875-8426
Web: http://www.haw-hamburg.de/inet
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to