On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > On 07/02/2017 10:52, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> I would prefer to try to keep the open projects separated by their >> topic areas (using the component field) to maintain some organization >> of the open projects page. > > > Nice. > >> I have made a small change to add a >> sub-heading to reflect this. Each topic area (component) will need a >> separate query to generate. > > > Will the Component field be flexible enough for our projects? I suppose we > can mix keywords and components if we hit a case we cannot separate. > We can use the keywords field with the "~=" operator is "Contains", so we can do keywords~=... in the query that generates the per-topic list.
That would be better than the component. It may complicate filtering on "SoC", but now we have the "project" ticket type so this may be sufficient. > FYI have updated https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2898 and it would be good if > all existing tickets could be updated. The changes are: > > - Use `[[PageOutline(1-5, Contents, inline)]]` and not the TOC macro because > the TOC macro only uses pages and the PageOutline macro works within > tickets. The TOC references are to pages we are not maintaining any more. > > - Change from marked headings to real headings. > OK. > Chris > > ps: This is a really nice way to manage our projects. Well done and thanks > to all for making this change happen. Yes. Big thanks to Tanu Hari Dixit for piloting a few pages so we can hammer out some of these questions. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel