On 23/01/2018 10:50, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org > <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: > > On 23/01/2018 01:49, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I installed all BSPs of the master and then all BSPs of the > no-preinstall > > branch. The difference in installed BSP files is this: > > > > https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/tmp/headers-diff.txt > <https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/tmp/headers-diff.txt> > > > > There are no removals. In the no-preinstall installation, there are > more header > > files present (this is expected). If someone has a problem with this, > then we > > can fine tune this later. For the preinstall removal this is not a > blocking point. > > > > The squashed commit is at the top of the no-preinstall branch: > > > > https://git.rtems.org/sebh/rtems.git/log/?h=no-preinstall > <https://git.rtems.org/sebh/rtems.git/log/?h=no-preinstall> > > > > I OK with this change being pushed to master. > > It would be great if someone who experienced the original problem of the > 'install' command failing on Linux during the preinstall phase could > please run > a test build with a large number of jobs to see if the problem has been > resolved. > > > I think that was a not so subtle jab at me.
Not really, it was to anyone effected and willing to help test. I seem to remember other reports of this happening. > Do you want me to test before or after Sebastian pushes the branch. I do not mind. This is the original reason for the change and so it would be nice to be able to close any related tickets. I cannot do this because I have not seen the problem. > > I am ok pushing it and cleaning up problems as we get more users. > Sure. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
