On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> On 23/01/2018 10:50, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org >> > <mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote: >> > >> > On 23/01/2018 01:49, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> > > Hello, >> > > >> > > I installed all BSPs of the master and then all BSPs of the >> no-preinstall >> > > branch. The difference in installed BSP files is this: >> > > >> > > https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/tmp/headers-diff.txt >> > <https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/tmp/headers-diff.txt> >> > > >> > > There are no removals. In the no-preinstall installation, there >> are more header >> > > files present (this is expected). If someone has a problem with >> this, then we >> > > can fine tune this later. For the preinstall removal this is not >> a blocking point. >> > > >> > > The squashed commit is at the top of the no-preinstall branch: >> > > >> > > https://git.rtems.org/sebh/rtems.git/log/?h=no-preinstall >> > <https://git.rtems.org/sebh/rtems.git/log/?h=no-preinstall> >> > > >> > >> > I OK with this change being pushed to master. >> > >> > It would be great if someone who experienced the original problem >> of the >> > 'install' command failing on Linux during the preinstall phase >> could please run >> > a test build with a large number of jobs to see if the problem has >> been >> > resolved. >> > >> > >> > I think that was a not so subtle jab at me. >> >> Not really, it was to anyone effected and willing to help test. I seem to >> remember other reports of this happening. >> > > Thanks Chris for the help fetching this. I have started a build of all BSPs > on the no-preinstall branch on rtbf64c. I could pretty reliably get > failures > on this machine with preinstall and make -j. > > I will report in the morning. > No issues using make -j with the number of jobs being 8 on a machine with 12 cores (6 real). Same failures as master. powerpc-qoriq_core_0 and powerpc-qoriq_core_1 did not build. This was with my test script. I will rebuild today with the bsp-builder[1] [1] The bsp-builder still has a %s incorrectly in the output [ 2/1565] arm/altcycv_devkit (no-posix) Building run: %s: arm/altcycv_devkit.no-posix\ make -j 3 > >> >> > Do you want me to test before or after Sebastian pushes the branch. >> >> I do not mind. This is the original reason for the change and so it would >> be >> nice to be able to close any related tickets. I cannot do this because I >> have >> not seen the problem. >> >> > >> > I am ok pushing it and cleaning up problems as we get more users. >> > >> >> Sure. >> >> Chris >> > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel