Hello everyone, Thank you, Heinz, Gedare, Chris and Joel for your advice. If there are issues in making a buildset for 4.10 then should I build EPICS with RTEMS 5 by hand first and note down the process and then proceed to make the buildset for it?
Please suggest for the future steps. Thanks Mritunjay On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 5:38 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 5, 2020, 6:12 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> On 6/7/20 12:47 am, Heinz Junkes wrote: >> > Thank you, this is exactly where I was unsure. >> > @Chris: Can you give a recommendation here? >> > Danke Heinz >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > Fritz-Haber-Institut | Phone: (+49 30) 8413-4270 >> > Heinz Junkes | Fax (G3+G4): (+49 30) 8413-5900 >> > Faradayweg 4-6 | VC: 102220181...@bjn.vc >> > D - 14195 Berlin | E-Mail: jun...@fhi-berlin.mpg.de >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > >> >> On 5. Jul 2020, at 16:20, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 1:18 PM Mritunjay Sharma >> >> <mritunjaysharma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:28 AM Heinz Junkes < >> jun...@fhi-berlin.mpg.de> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Hello, Mritunjay, >> >>>> that's good news. Don't you want to try to develop a rsb-set for >> exactly this combination of RTEMS4.10 and EPICS7? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Sure, I am ready to do this and then do it with RTEMS5 in the same >> way. Please tell how to begin or some existing similar >> >>> work that can guide me how to proceed further in relation to rsb-set >> for RTEMS4.10 and EPICS7. >> >>> >> >> >> >> I don't know if this is best. RSB didn't exist in 4.10. I haven't >> >> looked to see how well the rtems-source-builder/4.10 would support a >> >> package build. It should be discussed with Chris probably. A couple of >> >> packages were added in the 4.11 branch. >> >> I would leave 4.10 and move on. It may work but these things can expose >> issues >> that turn into distractions. >> >> Would making a script that does the build so we can document the steps be >> worth >> while > > > Yes. Emphatically yes. We need to make sure we know how it is best built > by hand to automate it. > > I firmly believe you should not attempt to automate something until doing > it manually is well understood and documented. > > After you have this down for one BSP, we need to ask questions like: > > + Is there any per BSP tailoring beyond the obviod architecture and > compilation settings? > > + Any tweaks to settings users may want? > > The manual process should include testing. The RSB is a great way to > automate and ease building but it doesn't address testing the packages yet. > > --joel > > >> Chris >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> devel@rtems.org >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel