On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:12 AM Mritunjay Sharma <mritunjaysharma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Thank you, Heinz, Gedare, Chris and Joel for your advice. > If there are issues in making a buildset for 4.10 > then should I build EPICS with RTEMS 5 by hand first and note > down the process and then proceed to make the buildset for it? >
Yes. > Please suggest for the future steps. > > Thanks > Mritunjay > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 5:38 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020, 6:12 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 6/7/20 12:47 am, Heinz Junkes wrote: >>> > Thank you, this is exactly where I was unsure. >>> > @Chris: Can you give a recommendation here? >>> > Danke Heinz >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> > Fritz-Haber-Institut | Phone: (+49 30) 8413-4270 >>> > Heinz Junkes | Fax (G3+G4): (+49 30) 8413-5900 >>> > Faradayweg 4-6 | VC: 102220181...@bjn.vc >>> > D - 14195 Berlin | E-Mail: jun...@fhi-berlin.mpg.de >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> > >>> >> On 5. Jul 2020, at 16:20, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 1:18 PM Mritunjay Sharma >>> >> <mritunjaysharma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:28 AM Heinz Junkes <jun...@fhi-berlin.mpg.de> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Hello, Mritunjay, >>> >>>> that's good news. Don't you want to try to develop a rsb-set for >>> >>>> exactly this combination of RTEMS4.10 and EPICS7? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Sure, I am ready to do this and then do it with RTEMS5 in the same way. >>> >>> Please tell how to begin or some existing similar >>> >>> work that can guide me how to proceed further in relation to rsb-set >>> >>> for RTEMS4.10 and EPICS7. >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> I don't know if this is best. RSB didn't exist in 4.10. I haven't >>> >> looked to see how well the rtems-source-builder/4.10 would support a >>> >> package build. It should be discussed with Chris probably. A couple of >>> >> packages were added in the 4.11 branch. >>> >>> I would leave 4.10 and move on. It may work but these things can expose >>> issues >>> that turn into distractions. >>> >>> Would making a script that does the build so we can document the steps be >>> worth >>> while >> >> >> Yes. Emphatically yes. We need to make sure we know how it is best built by >> hand to automate it. >> >> I firmly believe you should not attempt to automate something until doing it >> manually is well understood and documented. >> >> After you have this down for one BSP, we need to ask questions like: >> >> + Is there any per BSP tailoring beyond the obviod architecture and >> compilation settings? >> >> + Any tweaks to settings users may want? >> >> The manual process should include testing. The RSB is a great way to >> automate and ease building but it doesn't address testing the packages yet. >> >> --joel >> >>> >>> Chris >>> _______________________________________________ >>> devel mailing list >>> devel@rtems.org >>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> devel@rtems.org >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel