> > > >> In general, the patch set lacks test cases. > > > > I was thinking that the next step could be to add a generic device which is > > required to use the API (a file descriptor is needed). This is > something that wanted to ask in the mailing list first. When this device is > added, also the test cases can be. Furthermore I wanted to > split the submitted changes in order to make a review easier. > > A file descriptor should be optional. It should be possible to add a PPS > driver just using struct pps_state. > What do you mean with optional?
The RFC 2783 defines only a user API. For example for config the function time_pps_setparams() is needed. If we don't follow the RFC 2783, we will need to create an RTEMS API. Is that what you mean? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
