On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 at 09:33, Andrew Warkentin <andreww...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't really think the static Microkit/CAmkES type of architecture > will ever be viable for desktops or self-hosting. Basically nobody's > going to put up with rebooting into a different image for each > application like an 80s-era home computer (if that's the kind of thing > you meant by "bespoke seL4 images"). > On the other hand, Microkit feels a bit like the image build systems used by the EROS family, which could be used as dynamic systems. Because the systems were orthogonally persistent, the image generated was the /initial/ image for the system, new objects would be saved to the image as if they had been declared in the mki file. You could also use these images as a sort of initrd, with enough features available to bootstrap the rest of the system from disk. -- William ML Leslie _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@sel4.systems To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@sel4.systems
