Joe Krahn wrote:
I agree that device messages should all be in one place. There are
messages to and from the user, as well as to and from the device.

Hope I wasn't dancing on anyone's toes


So, if all of this will be an XINPUT expansion, this discussion
would be better off in the little-used XINPUT list.


There is such a list? Where?


As for control type names, Atoms make a lot of sense, because they
readily expandable, unlike integer enumerators as used in HID.
It also seems to me that the current Atom managing code would
be a reasonable place to create some sort of registry.

Atoms, enumerations, outright strings... I'm not too concerned either way, I only advise taking the opportunity to standardize the vocabulary behind the control name fields, lest we get caught in a mire. We're sort of there already, insofar as clients trying to infer too much meaning from existing XINPUT callback structs will get punished.


Just because I like to incite riots, if it turns out we send XML messages back and forth, I won't be too hot & bothered about it. (Now, duck!)

--
____               .:.                 ____
Bryan W. Headley - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to