David Dawes wrote:
> We use them in lots of places that require known size data types. If
> the C99 types had been globally available say 10 years earlier, this
> likely wouldn't have been the case. As it is now, we either need to
> find a mechanism for providing the C99 types on platforms that don't
> have them, or continue using the CARD{8,16,32} and INT{8,16,32} types,
> and also provide CARD64 and INT64 on more platforms than we currently
> do.
If you can make stdint.h be included, it would fix this I think. There
appears to be some magic that tries to include that file under certain
circumstances. That is the header that defines the standard int types for
C99.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
