I think you're right here. Since we can't assume that every platformI can do that but there's not much prior art of using u_int32_t either. In fact, just one file: loader/xf86sym.c, and a few header files, most of which seem BSD related. And equally small number use uint32_t. I didnt run into problems before your checking at revision 3.18. Perhaps the best way to avoid this is to use neither ... simply use unsigned int?
on which XFree86 is built has C99 types and that there's no previous
art of using uint32_t instead of the older u_int32_t in the XFree86
tree, the SCO diff should be reverted and changed to something that
will define u_int32_t on SCO if needed.
Kean
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
