On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 10:42:37AM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote: >David Dawes wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 09:05:06AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: >> >>>I notice many of the affected files do not bear the license notice >>>mentioned in the checkin notice. Is that intentional? Will everyone >>>investigating the license that applies to a file now have to check >>>every CVS commit log entry for that file as well as the file itself >>>to find out which license applies? >> >> >> Assume that anything attributed to me is covered by the 1.1 licence >> unless explicitly stated otherwise. > >You mean anything attributed to you in the existing copyright notice, or >in the CHANGELOG file?
Everything I do is covered by the 1.1 licence unless I explicitly state otherwise. David _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
