On 12 Feb , at 18:18:57, Steven Clift wrote: > We have had a lot of experience with public local conversations. We require > real names for trust and accountability. We are over 10% of households in > some areas.
it's a tricky question, and yes, although it's not in the presentation, there was a mechanism for private exchanges in there too. > > Our guess is that we can serve a lot more people with private exchanges where > people know exactly who they are speaking with in very small areas. Therefore > the conversation should not be accessible to others at a later date. We may > even expire messages. They idea is to provide a real counter to our public > exchanges without only being able to serve the blocks where a leader has > stepped forward. > Steven Clift > http://stevenclift.com > @democracy > > >> On Feb 12, 2010 2:53 AM, "Tony Bowden" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Stefan Magdalinski >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > 7 years ago, we... >> >> As long as you remember to cope with water. >> >> When I lived in Belfast I used to get rather annoyed at the number of >> services which would recommend things in Liverpool to me. >> >> Tony >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list [email protected] >> ... >> > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list [email protected] > Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: > https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public -- /* Stefan Magdalinski +27 82 0431230 (phone) smagdali (IM/twitter/flickr/dopplr/skype/etc) */ _______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
